Acronis 2016 Shortcomings
After another failed backup due to a time out error, I have come to the conclusion that Acronis 2016 is not a stable backup platform. It can do specific folders, or groups of folders without issue, but an entire HD backup to a gigabit connected NAS drive, no. Lost connections (verified at start), run overnight on a network that has minimal traffic, leads to timeout or lost connection errors.
As users who have paid for software, we should not have to download event log viewers to determine where this buggy software is hanging. Why is it taking 9 hours to backup 1 Gb of data? Why isn't this forum monitored by Arconis Tech Support and not "MVP Partners" Does Acronis even care? What level of discontent will appear on thier radar.
Here is what I am going to do: Uninstall 2016 and reinstall 2015, hopefully something that I can do without major heartburn. Regularly test restoring of files to make sure the backup is stable and usable. If I get 2015 running sucessfully, I will continue with full drive and specific folder backups. If not, I will keep 2016 and only back up the C:\Users|Me folder, which is my data, etc and leave full system restoral to a disk crash.
And, I am going to write a snail mail letter to the CEO expressing my displeasure with thier software. Unless somebody can provide the CEO's email, and since they never respond to end user tech support and/or feedback questions, this seems like the only path foreward.


- Log in to post comments

Bobbo's comments are spot on, total system configuration including the network a system is attached to is essential to good and proper performance. We usually find that users issues with network backups failing is a result of network or other hardware issues rather than the True Image product.
Some users believe that just buying a gigabit modem or router and adding that into a home network will yield gigabit speeds when the reality is that it is almost impossible to obtain gigabit speed due to the hardware involved in the network as Bobbo mentioned CPU and hard disk latency, with disk latency being number one in slow response times.
The network equipment itself must be top shelf as well or performance will not be as expected. I can personally attest to great performance from True Image in backup and recovery using True Image on my network however that is primarily due to the equipment I use and the hours spent in configuration of the network itself. As an example it is possible for me to perform a 100GB+ backup over my gigabit network in under 5 minutes and a restore of that same data takes about 11 minutes to complete using traditional spinner hard disks. It is also possible to cut those times in half when using SSD drives. And for a real speed treat if I use the newer PCIe based SSD's backup and restore is rediculously fast.
Having tested these various scenarios of hardware configurations out I conclude that the True Image product is not an issue in backup/restore performance, it is the rest of the hardware involved that causes such issues to arise and be a factor in the performance of the product.
- Log in to post comments

Thank you Enchantec for all your efforts for all of us. I am astonished at your time taken for a 100GB image, especially over a network. I image from an SSD to an internal HDD and 100GB takes between 20-30 minutes, please divulge your secret.
- Log in to post comments

My secret is really no secret at all. As I said before it's all about the hardware. I run a small yet rather complex home network. The backbones are an ASUS RT-AC3200 Multi-Channel gigabit Wireless router coupled to an eight port gigabit unmanaged switch which provides connections to 3 wired connections, 2 desktops and a custom built NAS server running the Linux based FreeNAS OS system. The NAS itself runs an I5 CPU, 16GB of 1600 DDR3 RAM, and a 12TB HDD drive pool consisting of 4, 3TB WD Red NAS drives.
All of my equipment is Jumbo Frame capable and has Jumbo Frames enabled. The combination allows for me to push 760mbps+ over the Cat 5e wired system. FreeNAS uses what is known as a ZFS filesystem which basically allows for a redundant raid array to be built using all attached disks if desired. So in my case there are 4 7200 RPM 64MB Cache drives writing data during a backup.
If I run a backup from one desktop to a second desktop all wired of course and from an SSD on one to an SSD on the other backup times for a normal 45GB Windows 10 Pro install will complete in around 4 minutes and 45 seconds. I have also tested backup from a Samsung 256GB PCIe M.2 SSD on one machine to a 500GB Samsung 850 EVO SSD on another machine same 45GB data size and the backup will complete in about 2 minutes and 35 seconds. At that rate I have fully saturated the wired connections at 1Gbps. The later illustrates the reduced latency of the solid state drive over that of a spinning hard disk.
- Log in to post comments

Phew! I had to have a lie down after trying to absorb all that technical stuff, you must have worked for Cray? I shall settle for my 20-30 minutes.
- Log in to post comments

Haha, I hear that! My scenarios are not typical of most users of True Image true. In general, a typical consumer grade small wired network should be able to achieve a data transfer rate of between 60MBps to 80MBps. Using those figures should help in deciding if there might be a problem with your setup or not. In your case I think given what you report that you are in that average sweet spot of performance.
- Log in to post comments

To close this discussion, I uninstalled Acronis 2016, downloaded and installed Acronis 2015 and was able to complete all backups WITHOUT ERRORS. No network time outs, no perpetual Calculating Space Required messages, just the solid performance we have come to expect from this Enterprise level backup software.
- Log in to post comments