Skip to main content

New file naming

Thread needs solution

Okay folks, I am a simple and not complex user of Acronis.  Love it however.  Be kind with my simple questions please !

After upgrading to 2020 I have just a quick question.

So, I get the new file name of .tibx.  New file type to save space and data storage format I assume.  I did have a full backup file size reduction of close to 16%.  Substantial.  But it brought up another question.  I typically only do full backup, not incremental types.  With ATI v2020 the full backup name went to simply computername.tibx, or for a 2nd full backup computername-0001.tibx.

Is there a way to identify which file type  (full versus incremental) it is by its name, or whatever?  Or to glean more information about versions other than the -0001 name.  Sometimes in the past I have forgot to set up the type of file backup I wanted and accidentally found .an incremental had been done versus a full.  Now, other than file size (which has also changed/reduced) I might not so quickly be aware of in incremental or full file type.

Actually, just wanting to know the new naming types and rules,  and benefit of the  change ?

0 Users found this helpful

Dan, please see the ATI 2020 User Guide: Backups created in Acronis True Image 2020 or later - this gives an overview of the naming conventions being used for both the new and older file formats.

The Activity page for each backup task will show you what backup scheme is being used and if you keep your backups either in separate folders or using unique names, then it should be quite easy to identify what files are of what type by using the combination of the above.

There hasn't been an in-depth description of the new format, but I believe the full backup and the incremental backups are kept in the same file - one chain, one file.  The files with a -nnn suffix are chains of backups, I have some non-siffixed files that must also be chains of backups.  (The first chain, perhaps?)   And there is sometimes also a file with meta-data file (without suffix).  Perhaps there is data from the first chain that gets kept in a small non-suffixed file once additional chains are produced.

I'm sure there are others that have a better understanding of this than I do.  I find it confusing.

This new convention is not as straightforward as the old one but it is apparently the convention Acronis uses in its cloud files and is migrating this convention to non-cloud backups.  

Here's my understanding.

The .tibx format applies to disk/partition backups, not to File and Folder backups, which keep the old .tib format.

The first backup for the task will be <filename>.tibx. All subsequent backup files will be of the form <filename>-<sequence>.tibx where the sequence is 0001, 0002, etc,

For Incremental backups, the increments are appended into the .tibx file.

For differential backups, each differential is in a new .tibx file.

Through automatic cleanup, .tibx files can be removed but the original <filename>.tibx will remain although it's size may become very small.

Whenever a new .tibx file is created (at least with differentials), something is updated in the previous .tibx file.

Validation, at least for full backups, seems to validate all backups in the task, not just the latest. At least that's how it worked in the beta. I have not yet installed the full version yet.

 

I read it the same as BrunoC

+1

Cloud backups also (apparently) use *.tibx format (see here).

Ian

Hi,

so for my understanding: in the past I made a full backup from time to time and some inc backups more often, which I could easily (and fast!) transfer to a different backup-destination. If those are now in one file, this is not possible anymore!

Am I right? This would not be an improvement!

Franz

Franz, welcome to these public User Forums.

If you are making Disks & Partitions backups that use the new .tibx backup format in ATI 2020 then all the files for an incremental backup chain are held within a single .tibx file.

If you are making differential backups, then these are still in separate files BUT are still dependent on the initial full backup for the chain.

For Files & Folders backups, these still use the older .tib format backup files so remain the same as with earlier versions.

Franz Franschitz wrote:

Hi,

so for my understanding: in the past I made a full backup from time to time and some inc backups more often, which I could easily (and fast!) transfer to a different backup-destination. If those are now in one file, this is not possible anymore!

I'm not sure I understand the value of this technique.  If you needed to use the incr files, you would need a complete chain - full plus incr files - in the same location.

Is your goal to keep the full backups as an archive and have incr files just for the most recent chain?  There have been several requests that Acronis give us this sort of facility.  It can, of course, be achieved by having another task the does an occasional full backup - but that wastes time and disk space.  Perhaps we need a Cleanup function that removed all increments but leave the full backup.

Franz,

If your intent in moving backup files to another location is for archive purposes you could still do that then recreate the task and remove the original task from the Scheduler.

If you were moving full backups that had subsequent inc's that you ran and moved them from within the ATI interface via the Move option then you are correct, you can no longer do that.

The point the OP is making is that before for differentials, you saw this:

Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB_full_b138_s1_v1.tib
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB_diff_b138_s5_v1.tib
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB_diff_b138_s6_v1.tib
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB_full_b139_s1_v1.tib
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB_diff_b139_s2_v1.tib
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB_diff_b139_s3_v1.tib
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB_diff_b139_s4_v1.tib
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB_diff_b139_s5_v1.tib
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB_diff_b139_s6_v1.tib
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB_full_b140_s1_v1.tib

 

Very easy to see where the full backups were made and what files were differentials.

Now it is:

 

CT1000P1SSD8 P3CR010-0007.tibx
CT1000P1SSD8 P3CR010-0008.tibx
CT1000P1SSD8 P3CR010-0009.tibx
CT1000P1SSD8 P3CR010-0010.tibx
CT1000P1SSD8 P3CR010-0011.tibx
CT1000P1SSD8 P3CR010-0012.tibx
CT1000P1SSD8 P3CR010-0013.tibx

 

With no way to change the file naming scheme that I have been able to see.

 

So after cleanup which one of the new ones? You can all tell me which ones are which from the older scheme, but none of you can tell me which ones are which with the newer scheme.  Filesize is not an indicator because of the nature of changes that can happen in the OS from time to time and I am not looking at these files on a regular basis.  This is a step back in functionality unless there is a way to change the filenaming structure. That's the point.

 

Backup renaming I suspect will be brought back to TI soon, probably in the 2021 version.  It has been a much requested feature.

As it stands with TI 2020 when the user configures the task is the only time the user can set the name of the backup.  So first thing you must do immediately after you choose Add backup is to enter the name for the backup you would like to see it as.

Example:  I have a backup I call Differential Test. I ran the backup and allowed it to create 19 differential versions.  So my backup files list as viewed in Explorer where:

  • Differential Test - 0001.tibx
  • Differential Test - 0002.tibx
  • Differential Test - 0003.tibx
  • etc. through Differential Test - 0019.tibx

After the 0019.tibx, I ran a manual clean up of the task.   I also changed the task retention rules to allow for more differential files to be created before a new full would occur.  So my backup file list became as follows:

  • Differential Test.tibx  (meta data file tracking for all previous backup files in the task)
  • Differential Test - 0020.tibx
  • Differential Test - 0021.tibx
  • Differential Test - 0022.tibx
  • etc.

Viewing in file explorer will show Date modified, Type, Size + whatever else you have set in the View tab Add columns option list.

In my view this works.

@Enchantech

Thanks for the response and I understand what you are saying. It is just sloppy. With the previous version I was using, I didn't have to actively modify anything. I simply had a 5 day differential rotation in between full backups with a 7 day cleanup and all was well. Simply checked in from time to time and it just worked.

I look forward to see that return in the future.

Andrew Evrovski wrote:

@Enchantech

Thanks for the response and I understand what you are saying. It is just sloppy. With the previous version I was using, I didn't have to actively modify anything. I simply had a 5 day differential rotation in between full backups with a 7 day cleanup and all was well. Simply checked in from time to time and it just worked.

I look forward to see that return in the future.

Andrew, your scheme should still work with .tibx files. Differential backups are still separate files, they can be cleaned up automatically/manually.

If you would like to check which backup used which method, you can use the Activity tab or Clean up backup versions (it is in the menu of the backup plan). They both provide information on the backup type.