Skip to main content

Acronis True Image 10.5 server vs TI 2015 Home compression differences

Thread needs solution

I have tested partition backup of Windows 2008 R2 x64 C partition (with 100 MB boot partition along in one full backup set). Backup was taken with Acronis True Image Server 10.5 and Acronis True Image 2015 Home Premium, both with "maximum compression". I have used in both cases split on 4.3 GB option.
In a case of Server, backuped files were around 34.5 gb.
Same backup on Acronis 2015 lasted much longer and had cca 58 GB of files.
The whole C partition is SSD with 116 GB and 63 GB filled with mixed data (no multimedia or office files at all!).

Why is so big difference?
Thx
Funky

P.S.
I'm testing your product to see if this will suit us in our needs...

0 Users found this helpful

Maybe haven't said, I used boot CD option (no Acronis software installed) and also repeated test twice on both Acroonis configuration.
Results were the same!

I suspect at least one difference is the exclusion list which would differ between the two versions.

If yours is a business, there are other difference between the two which make 11.5 more suited for business.