Wish I had read around in this forum before buying Acronis...
Almost every aspect of the home version of TI is garbage. It is user unfriendly, advertises falsely, and is for most home use not only impractical, it can (in most cases WILL) also lead to loss of data.
Cross-platform cloning works well enough, but cross-platform ( hardware or OS) copying or recovery leads almost invariably to bit parity issues = the famous "corrupt .tib" file error, which, without special knowledge of DOS copy functions is equivalent to lost data.
Copying to DVD (which is repeatedly encouraged in the users manuals) is a ridiculous and ultimately futile endeavor, because if the archive size is to encompass more than one DVD it means an endless merry-go-round of disc-changing - and the more .tib files you create means increasing your chances of CRC-errors. Absurd.
Customer support is next to non-existant, the forum moderators and the users manuals are tacitly misleading and the product itself is seriously limited, not only in delivering what its producers/distributors promise, but generally in its spectrum of functionality.
Summam scrutemur: If you are not a techie, do not buy this software.

- Log in to post comments

@ Andromeda492 very well said
Andromeda492 wrote:I copy my major images to DVD, but if I had to restore from one (if the HDD the original .tibs are on died, that is) I would probably copy the image from DVD onto a new HDD and then restore.
Thats definitely the best way to do it!
Lots of good advice there!
If you are aware of the bugs and are able to work around them until they are fixed, ATI is reliable.
- Log in to post comments

@ Andromeda492 and James H
Firstly, big Thx to both of you for your helpful and thoughtful responses, which were also ( IMO ) very prompt. Thank You!
I am still dissatisfied with my product choice, and will "jump ship" as Andromeda would put it. However in future I will be storing in natural format. It may cost more and be time-consuming with all those grandfather-father-son backups, but at least it meets my computer-illiteracy needs.
I knew during the writing of my first posting that I made mistakes which are, as it appears now, irreversible. These errors, resulting in the loss of some very nostalgically valuable data, could have been avoided, had the distributors simply indicated the complications inherent in this form of imaging, and particularly the negative aspects of large file size recovery on multipart storage media. The issues I above addressed were known to the distributors, yet they chose to avoid informing lusers such as myself to the deficiencies/dangers, prefering to project the image of an idyllic "one-click" solution. Even after one has purchased their product.
Once again - absurd.
So, alas I will stick to my guns on this one... Once again however, I wish to repeat my thanks for your participation, for not taking my posting personally and not simply bashing.
cheers, mike
- Log in to post comments