Restore Partition vs Restore Files
In Acronis 2009, I made a backup of the entire partition, but I excluded one folder. When restoring, I'm wondering what is the difference between restoring the entire partition, or restoring all the files. Does this accomplish the same thing? I have that folder I excluded, so I was thinking restoring the partition would delete that folder; is this correct? In this case, it looks like just restoring all the files will give me the same end result, but let me keep my folders, but I'm not sure. Please let me know.
Thank you,
- Eli

- Anmelden, um Kommentare verfassen zu können

Thanks for your reply, and I apologize for not getting back; busy busy busy.
When you do a full restore of a disk image, does it do this in command-line (ie it reboots and goes into the DOS-like interface)? Under backups it lists the backup I made as a Full backup. But whatever I did last time (forgot which choice I chose), it started restoring files right inside the Acronis interface and did not need to reboot.
- Anmelden, um Kommentare verfassen zu können

If TI has to restore the image containing the active partition, typically C, then it must reboot and load the Linux recovery environment since Windows can't be running. Windows needs a disk to run.
If you are restoring a non-active partition then it doesn't have to reboot and if you are only restoring data it doesn't have to reboot.
- Anmelden, um Kommentare verfassen zu können