Direkt zum Inhalt

ATI 2014 Naming Conventions

Thread needs solution

Can someone explain a couple of ATI's naming conventions for me please?
In the filesets:
Documents_full_b1_s1_v1.tib << Case 1
Documents_full_b1_s1_v2.tib << Case 1
Documents_inc_b1_s2_v1.tib
Documents_inc_b1_s3_v1.tib

Documents_full_b2_s1_v1.tib
Documents_inc_b2_s2_v1.tib
Documents_inc_b2_s3_v1.tib
Documents_inc_b2_s3_v1-2tib << Case 2

Case 1. Why would there be a V1 and V2 version of the full backup?
Case 2. The manual seems to indicate that the 1-2 version was created because a duplicate file name was found. Assuming that 1-2 is the correct file - would this be correctly picked up if I needed to perform a restore from this set?
Thanks
Dave

0 Users found this helpful

This may help.
Essentially, the contents of your computer at backup time is what is restored via the selected tib file.

When restoring, user chooses the restore file and the program will restore that and all prior files beginning with the full,
so, if you select the v1-2, All prior tib files will be restored.
if you select the v1, all prior tib files will be restored and the 1-1 would not be as it is a later creation.

Things which can cause a file splitting is
A restore of a prior tib file and the restore file remains after the restore so the computer has to deal with a same name backup file situation.

If the storage disk is a formatted as FAT32, the files will be split at 4+G.
If the storage disk is formatted as NTFS, there will be no split due to file size--if that problem should exist.