TI v.11 What would be a normal time to backup in following conditions ?
It would be nice if you can give me a realistic time, required to make following backup. I am making a backup which seems taking too much time in the following conditions :
- Acronis® True Image Home® version 11.0 (build 8.101) runs on a
PC with Pentium-4 (2.66GHz)
- The whole NTFS system partition (WinXP Professional) to backup
(23.2GB used space on ATA disk)
- Destination to NAS Disk. This external NAS disk has 1TB in Raidmode.
writing the same on two disks 500GB.
- Both PC and NAS disk are directly wired to a router
- The whole system is protected (should I say infected ?) by Symantec's Norton Internet Security 2009, which is probably the cause of a very slow backup proces.
NIS2009 runs as a "service" in Windows but I can't kill the process with TaskManager (access denied). Closing the operator's console doesn't stop NIS2009.
I need to compare my time for this backup (4 hrs +32 min !) to what I normally should expect.
Thank you very much for your opinion.

- Anmelden, um Kommentare verfassen zu können

I've been trying to use the TI 11 (build 8,101) boot disk to backup my entire C: drive (140GB of data) to an external USB 2.0 hard drive. I let the full disk backup run all night night, but in the morning it said it still had 5 days to go. The progress indicator had barely moved. I repeated the process verifying different options (no compression, highest disk performance setting, etc.) but had the same problem.
I booted back to Windows to test the read/write speed of the external drive using a simple file copy. The Write speed to the device was approximately 1.2GB/minute, which works out to roughly 2 hours for my entire 140GB.
I've been struggling with this issue for a long time. Does anyone have any idea what I could do to resolve this?
- Anmelden, um Kommentare verfassen zu können

Kevin:
Your disk transfer rate in Windows looks good. Slow speed in the Linux recovery environment usually indicates a lack of the proper USB 2.0 driver on the recovery CD.
Has Acronis posted a more recent ISO image file for the TI 11 bootable media? If so, go to your account on the Acronis web site and check under My Products and Downloads for newer releases of the bootable media.
Otherwise, have you tried different USB ports on the PC? Try one that is directly connected to the motherboard. If you're using a hub, try bypassing it.
- Anmelden, um Kommentare verfassen zu können

Mark,
I must apologize to you. It is not my usual behavior... to not react, when being helped.
Sometimes life decides on what happens in such way far beyond what we would like to happen.
The slow backup issue is still pending. For sure when backing up to my NAS disk.
It takes several long hours to back up the system partition C:\ (Windows-XP Pro) (about 24.5 GB used disk space) This cannot be normal, but eventually it finishes the job anyway.
Actually I could try a similar backup to another disk (firewire connection) and myabe also to another PC on my inhouse (wired) LAN network.
Coming back to your questions :
1. I use the Windows version of TI 11
2. Since this was my opportunity to be back here and to read your advice,
I still must make the test to measure the time required to transfer a large file from system harddisk to the NAS. (using Windows Explorer or some other file manager) I will be back with the results.
This is only my guess: Normal copies will probably be fast enough, but True Image 11 will remain slow in comparison.
I have to make the "COPY large file test" with and without the security software active , and the compare the measured times.
Then I have to do the same test for a partition backup with TI11 (with and without security software).
I must mention that I'm not using Norton Security any more but Avira "Antivir Premium".
This seems to be very less demanding on the CPU power than Norton.
I also use WinPatrol and the COMODO firewall, which I both could stop running to improve TI11 running time. The RAM memory is 2GB, which (to me) does not seem to be a bottleneck to do the job at the speed that you mention.
Maybe the RAID cofiguration (writing double amount of bytes) of this NAS is slowing down the process, but I doubt if this is the major reason.
I will be back "some" time later.
My (delayed) thanks
G.
- Anmelden, um Kommentare verfassen zu können