Disk image or file backup for non-system drives?
Hi everyone!
I have a basic question:
I have several non-OS drives in my PC that each contain about 300 GB of data (mostly audio files). These drives don’t contain any system files, programs or partitions. For easy recovery of these files to a new (most likely bigger) hard disk after a crash, would you recommend I use a disk image or file backup?
- Se connecter pour poster des commentaires
Thanks for your input, Grover. I do a lot of backing up of non-system drives (audio data, lot's of files) and previously used Microsoft's SyncToy for this (also a file-copying program, like Karen's Replicator). However, I had a hard time trusting a small program like SyncToy with all these big file backups. That's why I switched to TI. May I ask why you don't recommend using TI for file backups?
- Se connecter pour poster des commentaires
All my files are included with TrueImage disk image backup. Any additional copies of files only (when needed) is done without using TrueImage or any other backup software--just plain copies.
A backup by TrueImage has to be read by TrueImage. It is a proprietary software and other programs cannot read those backups. If there is a problem with the backup, the backup file becomes useless. I have multiple copies of all my backups no matter how the backup was created.
If I have files or folder in which I want a 2nd copy backup, I will usually use Replicator as it is has always been completely dependable--although written several years ago by Karen Kenworthy who is now decesased. It provides error reports and complete information about what is has done or was unable to do.
I have not used SyncToy and others have recommended RoboCopy plus there are others.
The speciality of TrueImage is Disk Backups and REcovery. I find that is works well for me but file backup software is not my choice when a normal original copy will do. Other people may have different need--just stating my choices based on my needs.
You may find item 12 of interest--at this link
http://forum.acronis.com/forum/3426
- Se connecter pour poster des commentaires
Grover will have his own reasons but the most obvious is that in order to recover anything from a TI backup you have to have access to TI, either installed or the rescue media. File copying programs keep the files in their original state and require no special software whatsoever when recovering. Personally I have found sync programs such as SyncToy and SyncBack totally reliable and satisfactory for file backups and wouldn't even consider using TI for the reason stated.
I also keep the OS partition strictly for the OS and installed software, with all personal folders kept on other drives/partitions. This both simplifies and speeds up backing up but also ensures data files are not overwritten when restoring an OS image.
- Se connecter pour poster des commentaires
For files that are in compressed formats, don't change a lot or not at all, using a proprietary container to store the backup copies is not only useless but dangerous. If the container gets corrupted, all the backup copies are lost.
So to backup videos, photos, movies, music, etc., some sync software is actually better. I particular like SyncBack SE (there is also a free version, but without retention capabilities). The Windows 8 built in file backup is actually pretty good also.
- Se connecter pour poster des commentaires
As said above by others already - for files that cannot be compressed much I would mirror them. But anyhow - the mirror does not require any special software to read it what can be a big advantage in a disaster case.
Check out the following freeware. The GUI looks a bit outdated but it works great. The big advantage of this mirror software is that you can keep a history if you want. Files that get changed at the mirror side can be moved to an archive container automatically. And the size of this container can be set.
- Se connecter pour poster des commentaires
AD wrote:previously used Microsoft's SyncToy for this (also a file-copying program, like Karen's Replicator). However, I had a hard time trusting a small program like SyncToy with all these big file backups.
I liked SyncToy. However, after I found file-level errors (failed checksums) in some files it copied, I abandoned it in favour of Robocopy. Robocopy is a robust file-based backup tool. Once a Robocopy script is written, I just reuse it by launching a .bat file (which could also be scheduled). I mirror my media partition to external HDs, and Robocopy is fast because it will backup only the changes and it is multi-threaded.
For disk imaging and OS-level backups, I rely on True Image.
- Se connecter pour poster des commentaires
Thanks for your comments, everyone!
- Se connecter pour poster des commentaires