TI 2019 v. TI2020
TI-2020 and the .tibx disk backups are turning out to be a disaster for me.
I'm planning on going back to TI-2019. Can anyone tell me what the advantage of TI-2020 is.
A full disk backup should always be restorable as a stand-alone file logically.
Stand-alone backups always made sense to me. TI-2020 is really complicating things from my viewpoint.
If I have to go back to a stand-alone older disk backup because of a corruption or malware, etc. that did not get noticed or caught, I've been able to restore an older disk backup, then update if necessary, and then restore a new file backup to correct the problem.
TI-2020 just adds absurd validation times with no significant improvement. The idea that if the first backup file gets deleted in a schedule doing full disk backups then makes all the remaining full disk backups useless is seems very illogical to me.
So, explain why I should stick with TI-2020.
I've been using Acronis for about 15 years but I'm getting very frustrated with the changes made beyond Backup 11.5 and TI-2019. I will be switching back to TI-2019 shortly.
Thanks,
Ralph Nielsen


- Accedi per poter commentare

Steve:
Thanks for your comments. I did go back and remove my email.
I see where now in the new TI-2021 release, they allow setting validation on only the last backup version to alleviate the issue of validating the whole "merged" chain.
Your comments are generally helpful, but for now I'm sticking with TI-2019 because my schedules will basically run OK without the long validation times.
I was basically already doing your #1 suggestion and may have stuck with it but when I experienced the long validation time I went on the forum and then understood the issue.
I will eventually have to upgrade, but for now I will stick with TI-2019.
But your comments are always appreciated.
Ralph Nielsen
- Accedi per poter commentare