Salta al contenuto principale

Novice needs advice on full drive cloning & backup

Thread needs solution

Hello,

I am pretty much a newbie when it comes to back up and disk cloning, so some input and help would be much appreciated.

What am I trying to back up: a Win7 machine with one main drive containing OS, software and files. And a second, empty drive reserved for backing up (and maybe serving as scratch disk for Photoshop CS5).

How I imagine doing the backup: if it is possible, I would like to make a monthly, full copy of my main drive to the second drive, which in case of failure of the main drive could be directly swapped and used as new main drive. However this would create two bootable drives, which is not possible with Win7, correct? LAN drives or external USB drives are possible too.

What alternatives are there, or what would the best method be to have a full backup of my current system and installed programs, that can be recovered easily. Does this always require bootdisks?

Second, I would also like to do scheduled daily and / or weekly backup of various files, which should ideally be placed on a different partition of my blank drive. I am a photographer, so I have a large volume of files to back up regularly, approx. 70-90 Gb. Some files (the negative images) don't change often, but current edit projects do, and those would need to be backuped more often than the negatives.

What would the best method for this? And are the backup files created by Acronis software browsable like a regular folder, or do they have to be decompressed to access the files?

I hope someone can shed some light on my questions, and I'd like to thank in advance anyone who can give me advice or recommendation on the best method, and whether Acronis has the software functionality I am looking for.

0 Users found this helpful

Daniel,

I take it from your questions that you have yet to install True Image of any kind. If you do already have a copy then if you could post the version here that would help, as there are some major differences between performing some things between version 2010 and version 2011.

1. For redundancy purposes and the security of not having your photo files trashed, you need to image them to either an external drive or install a removable drive rack in your PC. The reason being that if you suffer major hardware failure or power surge/brownout it is possible for both internal drives to be affected. An external or a drive that has been removed from the PC won't be affected by such an event.

2. Ideally I would make images to both an external or a removable internal drive plus to an internal one.

3. Cloning, the only drive worth cloning IMO is the system drive with the OS on it. You are correct that you can't have both drives connected internally at the same time (although there are ways around this, but is not recommended to be tried until feeling computer confident). The advantage is as you mention the drive can just be plugged in and away you go and of course you can check right away if a clone was successful or not. There are people here who have a rotation of 3 drives, that they clone (obviously in rotation) and after each clone the clonee drive becoms the new operating drive.

Cloning cannot be automated using TI, it might be possible using Windows Scheduler but I've never tried or considered that before.

If your photos are currently on your system drive and the system drive has just one partition, I would suggest storing the photos at the very least on a separate partition of the main drive and even better on a second drive (I store mine on two physical drives and one partititoned drive). Don't try repartitioning your current drive without having made a full drive image prior.

If you decide to image your data then you can set up monthly/weekly etc - how you do this may depend on what version of TI you are using. It might be that ABR10 Workstation might be better in this regard to TI, but............

If your images are in JPG or similar then you will not get much if any compression when making an image file. If they are in TIFF. BIGTIFF or RAW there will be some compression. This needs to be born in mind when deciding the size of any drive to hold the images - cloned drives of course must be the exact same size or larger.

You mention a LAN or NAS drive, these would be suitable as well, though I'm not sure about cloning via a LAN, imaging no problem only possible drawback will be time due to network congestion.

Whilst technically a clone doesn't require the rescue CD, it is best that one is made and there are advantages to cloning via this versus in Windows, not least Windows isn't running so can't interfere with the process and you can easilt whip out the drive or disconnect it beofre the reboot is required. If you are imaging then it is very important that the rescue disk is made - there is a facility for the PC to be able to autoboot into the recovery environment called the ASRM however, you still will need to have made a recovery CD and ensured that you can boot your system successfully from it and that it can see all your drives and network (if NAS'ing).

You can browse your TI images in two ways - via Windows Explorer or by mounting them as virtual disks. Both allow drag and drop, but only mounting gives you the ability to actually add something to an image (not advisable by the way).

OK after that waffling and creating even more confusion, questions??