[RESOLVED] Backup consolidation useless.
Now I know, it has not much in common. But please read ahead.
I am testing Acronis and one thing is really bad: Backup consolidation for end users. If you only have one backup disk, consolidation takes days to finish. A full backup needs a couple of hours. Why is that?
I assume because Acronis is creating a second archive and puts all the files from previous jobs in the new file. That way, the hard disk reading head are jumping from one location on the disk, to another. All the time. Hence a consolidation jobs takes ages because the hard disk write performance is interrupted by millions of read operations.
What does that have to do with Windows 8's File History?
Well, Windows is sorting files in folders and using indexes. Hence, if a files is not changed, there is a link to the previous backup. So far TI2013 has the same technique.
Now for the difference:
If you delete old File History backups, Windows must create a new full backup out of the old files. If you delete the first backup of incremental backups, that's always the full backup. If you delete the full backup, you need to synthetically create a full backup from the remaining files. Because File History is working with files and folders, rather than archives, it just changes the indices to the files.
In short:
- Acronis' technique to create a consolidation or synthetic full backup is horribly slow, taking ten times than a regular full backup.
- Windows need a couple of minutes for a consolidation or synthetic full backup.
Issue resolved here.
- Accedi per poter commentare