Testing the waters...
I want to like this, and will probably buy if I can understand some things. I am running the trial of 2011 Home. I did a backup yesterday using 'version chain', and scheduled it to run nightly. It ran last night and the first incremental backup is BIGGER than the initial backup(!). Why would that be so?
My initial backup from yesterday is called computer_c.tib, 18,743MB
The backup last night is called computer_c(1).tib, 20,086MB
This isn't the way I thought version chain was supposed to work. Or am I not understanding something?
OS is Win7 64bit, source drive is an Intel SSD 120G, destination is a network share conventional HD.
Thanks

- Accedi per poter commentare

Thanks, Scott. While I don't particularly like parens in filenames, my main concern is why is the incremental backup bigger than the initial backup?
Also, after backing up yesterday, then rebooting, my PC hung for 15 minutes with a "windows is busy" message. Apparently TIH was validating the first backup even though I told it not to.
I'm curious as to your opinion on where to look for a better solution. I just (heh) want something that does the job reliably with no fuss, is easy to set up and understand, and doesn't cost a fortune.
- Accedi per poter commentare

Shroom,
When you choose version chain, the program does first a full backup. This one will never be deleted. Then The program starts a chain of full/incrementals, as you can see in the animation when you select this backup scheme.
So now, you have 2 fulls. YOu should something like computer_c(1)2 next time.
- Accedi per poter commentare